Friday Factoids: To Rx or Not to Rx–Psychology’s Ongoing Debate

I went home contemplating this week’s Friday Factoid. Time was pressed and I had no idea what to address. So I turned on my television and tuned in to the local channel 6 news. There it was, a short news story featuring a State of Illinois proposal that would in essence approve psychologists to exercise prescription privileges.

 

Immediately, I said, “Wow, that’s interesting.” I did a search for the local channel 6 website and located the article entitled, “Panel OKs bill to let psychologists prescribe.” According to the Springfield, Illinois (AP), “The proposal was signed off by an Illinois legislative panel recently on a 9-5 vote.” At this time things are looking bright as the proposal heads further along in the full approval process. If this peaks your interest (and I’m sure it has), then take a look at the Illinois website. Once there, look on the left panel and put in the number SB2187 to read a summary of the bill.

 

The debate over prescription privileges has caused differences of opinion among psychologists and other professionals. The local news article (2014 May 8), mentioned that a proponent of the bill, Rep John Bradley, says, “Letting psychologists prescribe drugs would help ease a doctor shortage.” However, opponents from the Illinois State Medical Society say, “Psychologists do not have enough medical training to safely dispense medication.” You can take a look at the fact sheet that was sponsored by the Illinois Psychiatric Society for a more complete summary of their opposition.

 

In closing, in her article, Physicians Fight to keep Psychologists from Prescribing, Melville (2013) expands on this very exciting debate.  More interesting was the fact that she indicated that during the mid 1990s, out of 170 proposals from various states, only three states granted prescription privileges, namely, “New Mexico, Louisiana and Guam.”

Have you considered your position in this ongoing debate?

 

References:
Illinois Psychiatric Society Do you want your medication prescribed by someone who took an online psychopharmacology course? http://www.illinoispsychiatricsociety.org/advocacy/Documents/IPS%20FinalFactSheet%20April%209.pdf

 

Melville , N.A. (2013). Physicians Fight to Keep Psychologists From Prescribing. Retrieved from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/781519

 

WPSD Local 6 News, (2014 May 8). Panel OKs bill to let psychologists prescribe. [Television Broadcast]. Retrieved from  http://www.wpsdlocal6.com/story/25465795/panel-oks-bill-to-let-psychologists-prescribe.

 

David J. Wright, MA., MSW
WKPIC Doctoral Intern

 

 

Friday Factoids: The Affordable Healthcare Act and the Practice of Psychology

 

 

 

Psy.D/Ph.D doctoral candidates in psychology, psychiatry, and other behavioral health care disciplines across the country will be face important decisions after graduation. The number one decision involves whether one will seek employment as a private practitioner or employment through a large employee based medical group.

 

 

The federal mandate and recent implementation of the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” ( ACA; otherwise known as Obamacare) now provides all enrollees access to mental and behavioral health services as well as substance use and rehabilitation services as part of their insurance coverage (Varney, 2013). Additionally, the Mental Health Parity Law (MHPL), essentially requires insurance companies to provide same health care benefit coverage as other medical coverage and treatments, which will further guarantee coverage to clients. In her article, Obamacare Changes How Therapist Do Business, Varney (2013) explores the impact that the ACA and MHPL will have on new and seasoned psychologists, psychiatrists, marital therapists, and social workers as they contemplate how they will operate their business.

 

 

Interestingly, Varney mentions how mental health experts have seen a gradual shift away from “mom and pop” private practices, to mental health consortiums or large interdisciplinary medical groups. Due to the changes in ACA and MHPL, private practice therapists who have typically operated with a “cash & carry” practice, are now faced with countless insurance plans to sift through; as well as the bureaucracy of billing codes and hard to process insurance claims. Additionally, therapists who already process insurance claims may be asked by insurance companies to accept a cut or discount for patients enrolled in ACA and/or participate in the health care exchange program (i.e., pick or choose the type of insurance package).

 

 

This paradigm shift in business operations is prompting those in private practice to consolidate resources with other practitioners by joining a consortium where mental and behavioral health services are part of a continuum of care. I cannot imagine the challenges of dealing with the “bureaucratic” red tape of insurance companies and the health care delivery system, but according to Varney, therapists in large mental health consortiums often have bargaining power with the insurance companies and can negotiate directly with them for higher reimbursement rates. As a therapist, perhaps a limitation of working in a large medical group means losing flexibility and autonomous functioning, such as handling the day to day administration, such billing operations, scheduling clients, etc., that is common in private practice. Whether you choose private practice or a large medical group, one will surely have to navigate the complexities of working with insurance companies.

 

 

Reference:

Varney, S. (2013), Obamacare Changes How Therapist Do Business. Retrieved from http://medcitynews.com/2013/10/obamacare-changes-therapists-business/.

 

 

David J. Wright, MA., MSW
WKPIC Doctoral Intern

 

 

Congratulations to Cassanda Sturycz!

Go, Cassie!!!

 

WKPIC’s practicum student received Western Kentucky University’s College of Education and Behavioral Science Outstanding Graduate Student Award in Clinical Psychology on Sunday April 27, 2014!

 

This award is given out once per year and it was presented by Dr. Randy Capps, head of the Department of Psychology, and Dr. Sam Evans, dean of the College of Education and Behavioral Science. She was nominated for the award by the coordinator of the Clinical Psychology Master of Arts Program, Dr. Rick Grieve.

 

We’re proud of you!

 

 

Summary of Pachankis, J.E., & Goldfried, M.R. (2004) Clinical Issues in Working with Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Clients

 

 

 

Heterocentrism, or the bias against the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, or Questioning (LGBTQ) population, can be seen at every level of our society, from laws restricting the rights and opportunities of LGBTQ individuals to homophobia manifested in face-to-face prejudice. Homophobia can even be turned inward, toward the self.

 

 

“Internalized homophobia” is seen when an LGBTQ individual assumes the negative bias of society against his/herself, often leading to anger and/or shame.  In a therapeutic setting, these beliefs present as anxiety, depression, relationship difficulties, suicide ideation, and the devaluation of LGBTQ activities.  Prejudices can be acted upon by even the most well-intentioned clinicians in various ways: assuming the client is heterosexual or excessive focus on orientation of the client, even if it is not an issue at hand.

 

 

Important issues that may require a clinician’s assistance have been identified by Clark (1987) as “encouraging LGB[TQ] clients to establish a support system of other LGB[TQ] individuals, helping clients become aware of how oppression has affected them, desensitizing the shame and guilt surrounding homosexual thoughts, behaviors, and feelings, and allowing clients’ expression of anger in response to being oppressed.” Identity development, couple relationships and parenting, families of origin and families of choice, as well as other relevant issues are of particular importance and can be especially difficult for LGBTQ individuals (Pachankis& Goldfried, 2004). It is the ethical responsibility of clinicians to be familiar with these issues and ensure their competency in addressing these with LGBTQ clients.

 

 

For more information about topics salient to the LGBTQ community as well as current research, please visit the American Psychological Association’s Division 44: Society for the Psychological Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transexual Issues website

 

 

References

Pachankis, J.E., & Goldfried, M.R. (2004). Clinical issues in working with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training,  41(3), 227-246.

 

 

Cassandra A. Sturycz, B.A.
Psychology Student Intern