Friday Factoids: Hoarding Disorder

 

 

Hoarding Disorder (HD) has been in the media spotlight. HD is a new psychiatric diagnosis added to DSM-5 in 2013. I have heard others ask in casual conversation “why would someone do that?” While this may sound like an answerable question to some, research has just begun to touch on the complexities of this disorder.

 

The DSM-5 describes HD as a “persistent difficulty discarding or parting with possessions, regardless of their actual value.” Patients suffering from HD often have co-morbid psychological conditions such as depression, substance abuse, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, and schizophrenia. While middle aged and elderly people are more likely to be diagnosed with HD, many patients report their symptoms began in late childhood or adolescence. Trauma and other significant stress may not be a cause of HD but can significantly exacerbate it. Hoarding seems to follow a pattern of slow and insidious symptoms starting in late childhood, and then accelerating after age 40. Every patient with HD is unique but categories of some items seem to occur more frequently. Paper items such as newspapers, magazines, books and junk mail are frequently stacked in the home. Various types of containers such as food containers, boxes and bins may be present. “Freebie” items are sometimes sought after and stored in excess. Food, clothing and kitchen items are a prevalant category of items. Broken items that a patient with HD feels may be repaired “someday” may be difficult for the patient to part with. Some items pose a higher sanitation and health risk. Rotting food, urine, feces, or used toilet paper may be a primary issue for the patient. Subsets of patients with HD keep large numbers of animals as pets. The patient may feel they are providing adequate care to their pets despite the presence of feces, urine and a large number of animals in poor condition present in the home.

 

While a higher number of patients with HD are identified in urban areas, those in rural environments are more likely to die from problems in their environment. One theory about this disparity is that HD is identified more quickly in urban areas due to the complaints of neighbors regarding sanitation problems. Patients who are residing in a more isolated environment may not come to the attention of authorities until there is EMS contact for fire, injuries from falling items, the patient falling, or other medical crises. Patients with HD report a higher number of chronic medical conditions with less medical care contacts than those of the same age. There seems to be a cluster of medical illnesses occurring at higher rates and younger than average age. Obesity, hypertension (HTN), diabetes, lung disease, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are a cluster of problems that seem to be more prevalant for these patients. Neurological problems such as stroke, dementia, seizure disorder and traumatic brain injury are reported more often by patients with HD. More systemic disease processes such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and Fibromyalgia seem to be somewhat more prevalant. Researchers have begun to examine the genetics of HD. The presence of HD and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) seem to be more prominent in some families.

 

Treatment of HD has proven difficult for mental health professionals. Research in this area is urgently needed. HD accelerates with age so mental health professionals are likely to see more cases of this disorder as the number of older adults increases. Some patients have poor insight and can seem oblivious to their plight. Many describe themselves as “thrifty” or “saving things” for others should a need arise.  Drastic interventions, like a forced clean-up of the home, have been shown to significantly increase the risk of suicide. Questions linger over what point hoarding behavior may constitute a danger to self, requiring involuntary hospitalization. HD seems to have a very high relapse rate with current treatments of SSRI medications and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Case management with routine home visits proved to be of benefit but legal and ethical dilemmas are present in this form of treatment. HD seems to be a condition of equifinality, meaning there are many paths involved in the earlier question of “why someone would do that.”

 

References

Ayers, C. R., Iqbal, Y., & Strickland, K. (2014). Medical conditions in geriatric hoarding disorder patients. Aging & Mental Health, 18(2), 148-151. doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.814105

Bratiotis, C., Steketee, G., & Schmalisch, C. S. (2011). The Hoarding Handbook: A Guide for Human Service Professionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drury, H., Ajmi, S., Fernandez de la Cruz, L., Nordsletten, A. E., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2014). Caregiver burden, family accommodation, health, and well-being in relatives of individuals with hoarding disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 159, 7-14. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.023

Saxena, S. (2007). Is compulsive hoarding a genetically and neurobiologically discrete syndrome? Implications for diagnostic classification. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(3), 380-384. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.164.3.380

Rain Blohm, MS

WKPIC Doctoral Intern

Friday Factoids: Are Mental Practice Exercises Beneficial for Individuals that Have Experienced a Stroke?

 

 

Results yielded from a new study conducted by Georgia State University indicates that a person recovering from a recent stroke should undergo both physical therapy and mental practice (also known as motor imagery) in order to gain the most optimal results. Motor imagery is a mental rehearsal of a motor action without actually performing the action (while physical therapy involves using repetitive, task-oriented training on the body part that is impaired). The combination of physical therapy and motor imagery should be used to improve motor movement, balance, and coordination in individuals that have suffered a recent stroke.

 

For participants, the researchers employed the use of 13 older stroke survivors in addition to 17 healthy control participants. The participants from the stroke group were placed in two groups: 1) motor imagery only; or, 2) motor imagery and physical therapy. The treatment was given within 14 to 51 days of the participants’ stroke; each participant experienced 60 total hours of rehabilitation. To assess the effectiveness of each treatment, the participants in the stroke group and the control group underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans before and after each treatment.

 

During normal brain functioning, there are multiple cortical areas of the brain that communicate with each other; however, following a stroke, these interactions are disrupted. After a stroke, there is damage to brain cells; it can take a long time for the neurons to grow back, if they grow back at all. Dr. Butler, a faculty member at Georgia State University, stated that when attempting physical therapy many stroke patients are unable to move at all. Therefore the treatment teams often incorporate motor imagery, as if the stroke patients simply think about moving that area of the body, it helps keep the neurons active near the area that died in the brain.  Results obtained from this study indicated that the individuals in the stroke group that participated in both physical therapy and motor imagery had a significant increase in the flow of information between several brain regions.

 

It’s interesting that simply thinking about something can produce such beneficial and even tangible outcomes. What other areas of health can this notion be applied towards?

 

Faisal Roberts, M.A.

WKPIC Doctoral Intern

 

Pedersen, T. (2015). Both Physical Therapy, Mental Practice Important in Stroke Recovery. Psych Central. Retrieved on April 13, 2015, from http://psychcentral.com/news/2015/04/13/both-physical-therapy-mental-practice-important-in-stroke-recovery/83468.html

 

 

Friday Factoids: An Influence in making Doctor Appointments: Loneliness?

 

A new study conducted by researchers at the University of Georgia’s College of Public Health found that the frequency of physician visits correlated with chronic loneliness in the elderly population. These findings are suggestive that creating interventions for elderly loneliness may significantly reduce physician visits and, correspondingly, health care costs. That begs the question of why. Is it that loneliness is detrimental to one’s health? Is it that if someone is lonely “reasons” to visit the physician may be influenced simply by to sheer longing for human contact? Perhaps a combination of the two? Or perhaps something else entirely?

 

The study examined senior citizens living in the general community and not those in a retirement community. The study relied on data collected in 2008 and 2012 by the University of Michigan’s Health and Retirement Study, a national survey of Americans that were over the age of 50. In order to assess loneliness, participants completed a survey examining their feelings regarding lack of companionship and social/emotional isolation. To meet the criteria for “chronic loneliness,” participants had to be identified as lonely in both years of the study (2008 and 2012, respectively).  The researchers reviewed responses from 3,530 of adults over the age of 60 that lived in the general community. The results are suggestive that chronic loneliness was significantly associated with the number of visits to the physician, although it did not appear to correlate with hospitalizations. 

 

These findings may implicate that the actual loneliness (as opposed to the detrimental impact of loneliness on health) plays a role, as the participants may have made an appointment with their physician because it is usually someone that they have known for years–and with whom they have built a relationship–therefore providing an element of sought after socialization. (As opposed to going to a hospital in which one typically does not know the staff there or which doctor they will be assigned). That is not to proclaim that the members of the elderly population malinger their symptoms in order to have an excuse to socialize with their physician; rather, it may be a confluence of variables, including the possibility of subconsciously generating reasons to visit a physician in order to alleviate loneliness. What do you make of these findings? Do you have any theories to explain it? Finally, hopefully we are spurred to facilitate meeting needs and helping a population to improve quality of life – can you think of any interventions to target loneliness in the elderly population?

 

Faisal Roberts, M.A.

WKPIC Predoctoral Intern

 

Nauert, R. (2015). Loneliness Drives Elders to Physician Offices. Psych Central. Retrieved on April 3, 2015, from http://psychcentral.com/news/2015/04/03/loneliness-drives-elders-to-physician-offices/83119.html

Changing the expectations of those with mental illness

 

 

It is important to ask the question, do we BELIEVE that the person we are working with can live a productive life?  At times it can be hard to do so.  The amount of trauma some individuals have faced in their lives, along with illnesses once thought to be disabling, add to the thoughts of some that maybe, just maybe, the best this person can do is stay out of the hospital.

 

The thought process connected to this must change in order to best serve the patient.  As a Peer Support Specialist, I go into it with the memories of the once overwhelming and nearly incapacitating effects of Bipolar Disorder I and PTSD.  I remember the long road and struggle to get well after diagnoses.  The bouncing back and forth from stable to symptomatic was frustrating until I found the right combination of medication. I also look at my life now and know that I can live a productive life.  If I can, why can’t other patients in this hospital?

 

A “productive” life can look differently to every individual.  Productive to some might mean volunteering; to others the word might mean staying sober.  Others may return to work and pursue a career like Kay Redfield Jamison, a well-known psychologist and author who writes about her own journey with Bipolar Disorder.  My victory was getting my degree and returning to employment.  I’m not cured by any means.  I still must work at it, as I tell the patients (peers) with whom I speak.  I go to my psychiatrist, my therapist, I watch my sleep patterns, and I try to manage my stress levels.

 

To some the goal may be to simply stay out of the hospital, but we must believe they can achieve beyond that.  Rebuilding their self-image and instilling hope may help make them realize that there IS life after diagnoses.  Others have done it successfully. A mental illness can become a small part of a person’s life.

 

Rebecca Coursey, KPS

Peer Support Specialist