Understanding Peer Support as a Profession

“Recovery is a process of change through which an individual improves one’s health and wellness, lives a self-directed life, and strives to reach their full potential.” This is the current definition of “Recovery” according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). It is a broad definition, but an inclusive one.  Full potential varies from person to person.  Living a self-directed life can be tough.

 

What is the role of Peer Support in promoting this definition?  For the most part, Peer Specialists are in what is called Recovery.  It was once mandatory that the specialist be in recovery for two years which meant out of the hospital and with active and successful self-care.  Now, because of the demand of these certified people, the rules have become a little more forgiving for those wanting to reach out to others in order to help promote hope.  There is no definitive time frame that an individual must wait to be a Peer Specialist.

 

Peer Support is reciprocal.  The specialist tries to use the skills he or she has learned to help those struggling, but the act of supporting another person helps the specialist out as well.  It gives a purpose and a reason to interact with other people.  It reminds one what is was like to be in that vulnerable time when first diagnosed; the difficulty in finding the right medication and support is a roadblock to many, and Peer Specialists know that and understand.

 

Peer Support has been shown to help in the process of recovery for those with serious mental illness.  Some Peer Specialists work exclusively with those struggling with substance abuse problems. There are also programs for specific populations, including Veterans.  With the requirement of continuing education, Peer Specialists must stay on top of current issues concerning mental health.  The program is quickly spreading in popularity, especially since it is now Medicaid billable.  For any questions, or if you know of a patient that may eventually enjoy providing such services, just let me know.

 

Rebecca Coursey, KPS
Peer Support Specialist

Friday Factoids: Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy a Paradigm Shift in Mental Health?

In 1938, Albert Hoffman synthesized lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). After accidentally ingesting it in 1943 he deemed it the “medicine of the soul.” Psychedelic drugs carry a stigma and it is easy to have very different views about them. Some have long claimed that, when taken responsibly and with the proper supervision, psychedelics like LSD and psilocybin are safe to consume. These drugs were researched extensively in the 1950s and 1960s, but funding stalled when the substances were classified as dangerous and lacking medical value. The Controlled Substance Act of 1970 classified psilocybin, LCD, and MDMA as Schedule 1 substances, which is defined as having “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.” Interestingly, approximately 0.005% of emergency department visits in the US involve LSD or psilocybin according to the US Department of Health and Human Services.

A growing body of evidence is beginning to show that psychedelics have therapeutic potential beyond what pharmaceutically made prescription drugs can do. A recent article published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology highlights the potential of LSD, psilocybin, and MDMA for treating a wide range of mental illnesses. Several other studies have shown positive results can come from short courses or single sessions of psychedelic-assisted psychotherapy. A study conducted for cigarette smoking at Johns Hopkins had a very high success rate with 80% of people was abstinent after six months after using psilocybin. A pilot study found a strong affect with alcoholism as well. In 2014, Swiss researchers studied the therapeutic benefits of LSD-assisted therapy in reducing anxiety in 12 patients who had been diagnosed with life-threatening illnesses. One year later, nearly all patients showed sustained reductions in anxiety with no adverse reactions. Lastly, one pilot study on 19 participants with drug-resistant PTSD showed a “significant and sustained-reduction in PTSD symptoms” in 83% of those given MDMA-assisted therapy.

The data suggest it’s the nature of the subjective experience that one has while under the effects of the substances that make psychedelics affective. Gasser P, Kirchner K, & Passie T (2015) study found the following:

Evaluations of subjective experiences suggest facilitated access to emotions, confrontation of previously unknown anxieties, worries, resources and intense emotional peak experiences. The experiences created led to a restructuring of the person’s emotional trust, situational understanding, habits and worldview.

Johansen and Krebs (2015) wrote:

Psychedelics are not known to harm the brain or other body organs or to cause addiction or compulsive use; serious adverse events involving psychedelics are extremely rare. Overall, it is difficult to see how prohibition of psychedelics can be justified as a public health measure.
Continued research into psychedelic drugs may one day offer new ways to treat mental illness and addiction. The emerging paradigm shift of psychedelics in a therapeutic setting may open new doors.


References:

Gregoire, C. (2015, September 16). Psychedelics Could Trigger A ‘Paradigm Shift’ In Mental Health Care. The Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/psychedelics-mental-health-care_55f2e754e4b077ca094eb4f0

Johansen, P. and Krebs, T. (2015). Psychedelics Not Linked to Mental Health Problems or Suicidal Behavior: A Population Study. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 1-10. doi: 10.1177/0269881114568039

Gasser P, Kirchner K, & Passie T (2015). LSD-assisted psychotherapy for anxiety associated with a life-threatening disease: a qualitative study of acute and sustained subjective effects. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 29 (1), 57-68

Rivas, A. (2015, March 15). Psychedelics May Improve Mental Health Disorder, But We’ll Have to Support the Research to Find Out. Medical Daily. Retrieved from http://www.medicaldaily.com/psychedelics-may-improve-mental-health-disorders-well-have-support-research-find-out-325780

Jonathan Torres, M.S.
WKPIC Doctoral Intern

Skills System Training!

20151028-DSC_1457

What do you do when you have patients who could really benefit from Dialectical Behavioral Therapy, but they can’t read, or have much lower intellectual capacity and can’t learn some of the bigger words and concepts, or have interference and challenges like active psychosis?

 

 

 

20151028-DSC_1460

 

 

You call Dr. Julie Brown and learn about The Skills System—-“an emotion regulation system for ALL learning abilities!

 

 

 

 

 

We can attest that the principles are simple, straightforward, easy to learn, and applicable 20151028-DSC_1463even for people with moderate intellectual disability. Dr. Brown was kind enough to pay Western State Hospital and WKPIC a visit, and to train psychology, social work, therapeutic recreation, Recovery Services, and all levels of nursing staff for an entire day.

 

We hope to use The Skills System to benefit patients with multiple hospitalizations due to emotional regulation issues related to chronic mental illness.

Friday Factoids: Challenges in Serving Rural Areas

Mental health disorders cause more disability and suffering in rural areas of our country. The presence of high rates of depression, domestic violence and child abuse creates increased risk for behavioral health issues. In addition, rural areas have higher rates of abuse of alcohol, tobacco, opiates, meth, inhalants, marijuana and cocaine. Suicide attempts and deaths by suicide occur more often in rural settings, with the rate of deaths by suicide running as much as 300% higher than an equivalent urban sample in some areas. Reasons for these disparities are certainly complex, but can be summarized under three primary categories: accessibility of mental health treatment, availability of services, and the acceptability of receiving services in rural culture.

 

Accessibility to services is a complex problem that rural health providers are attempting to address. Rural residents are likely to live further apart from one another, further away from services, and have less access to transportation. Telehealth is one recent technique being used to address some of these issues but it must be considered that due to the higher poverty levels in rural areas, some people may not have access to the technology required to receive telehealth in their home. The prevalent rates of domestic violence could provide a significant barrier for the use of telehealth in such situations. Many community mental health agencies provide i- school services in order to overcome some accessibility problems. Additionally, some rural mental health centers are creating “hubs” for telehealth services, but continue to struggle with transportation to get patients in need to these hubs for sessions.

 

The availability of services is limited in rural areas. A major problem in service provision is a relatively low number of doctoral level psychologists, coupled with high turn-over rates for any degreed professional attempting to practice in rural areas. Structured treatment locations are even more limited. Treatment centers for substance abuse or inpatient mental health can frequently be 1-4 hour commutes each way, and the lack of the availability of services closer to home may create an unbearable financial hardship due to time away from work, transportation costs, and childcare. Additionally, rural residents may have been aware of their behavioral health difficulties but unable or unwilling to access far away services until a crisis has occurred. This same pattern exists in accessing medical services as well, but less stigma is present in seeking medical versus psychological help. As such, treatment facilities that have a rural catchment area tend to have higher levels of acuity than urban centers, and thus face working with more urgent and challenging patients and conditions with minimal resources.

 

Finally, as mentioned, there is a lower rate of acceptability of mental health services by many rural people. While there have been recent gains made in decreasing mental health stigma, rural areas lag behind urban environments in understanding and accepting mental health issues.

 

A potential solution to some of these troubling difficulties may be integrated health clinics. Since medical services are more socially acceptable to rural residents, why not address accessibility and stigma by providing medical and mental health services under one roof? This lessens the patient’s anxiety about being identified by others within their community as receiving mental health services. Also, since medical and mental health issues interact and tend to exacerbate one another, approaching patients more holistically may serve to decrease both mental health and medical crises, and reduce overall acuity levels.

 

An additional hurdle is that many clinicians lack training in rural cultural competencies. Creative ways of working in rural communities are needed at graduate, practicum, and internship levels—and solutions may vary from community to community, needing specific approaches. Community mental health models that work well in urban environments may not be feasible in rural areas, so clinicians need to take a “troubleshooting” approach in the rural area they wish to serve.

 

Solutions to the barriers to mental health care in rural areas can be identified and developed. Most importantly, all mental health services need to be tailored to the culture and way of life of the rural area being served.

 

References
Smalley, K. B., Rainer, J., & Warren, J. (2012). Rural Mental Health : Issues, Policies, and Best Practices. New York: Springer Publishing Company

 

Rain Blohm, MS
WKPIC Doctoral Intern

 

Friday Factoids: Hoarding Disorder

 

 

Hoarding Disorder (HD) has been in the media spotlight. HD is a new psychiatric diagnosis added to DSM-5 in 2013. I have heard others ask in casual conversation “why would someone do that?” While this may sound like an answerable question to some, research has just begun to touch on the complexities of this disorder.

 

The DSM-5 describes HD as a “persistent difficulty discarding or parting with possessions, regardless of their actual value.” Patients suffering from HD often have co-morbid psychological conditions such as depression, substance abuse, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, and schizophrenia. While middle aged and elderly people are more likely to be diagnosed with HD, many patients report their symptoms began in late childhood or adolescence. Trauma and other significant stress may not be a cause of HD but can significantly exacerbate it. Hoarding seems to follow a pattern of slow and insidious symptoms starting in late childhood, and then accelerating after age 40. Every patient with HD is unique but categories of some items seem to occur more frequently. Paper items such as newspapers, magazines, books and junk mail are frequently stacked in the home. Various types of containers such as food containers, boxes and bins may be present. “Freebie” items are sometimes sought after and stored in excess. Food, clothing and kitchen items are a prevalant category of items. Broken items that a patient with HD feels may be repaired “someday” may be difficult for the patient to part with. Some items pose a higher sanitation and health risk. Rotting food, urine, feces, or used toilet paper may be a primary issue for the patient. Subsets of patients with HD keep large numbers of animals as pets. The patient may feel they are providing adequate care to their pets despite the presence of feces, urine and a large number of animals in poor condition present in the home.

 

While a higher number of patients with HD are identified in urban areas, those in rural environments are more likely to die from problems in their environment. One theory about this disparity is that HD is identified more quickly in urban areas due to the complaints of neighbors regarding sanitation problems. Patients who are residing in a more isolated environment may not come to the attention of authorities until there is EMS contact for fire, injuries from falling items, the patient falling, or other medical crises. Patients with HD report a higher number of chronic medical conditions with less medical care contacts than those of the same age. There seems to be a cluster of medical illnesses occurring at higher rates and younger than average age. Obesity, hypertension (HTN), diabetes, lung disease, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are a cluster of problems that seem to be more prevalant for these patients. Neurological problems such as stroke, dementia, seizure disorder and traumatic brain injury are reported more often by patients with HD. More systemic disease processes such as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and Fibromyalgia seem to be somewhat more prevalant. Researchers have begun to examine the genetics of HD. The presence of HD and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) seem to be more prominent in some families.

 

Treatment of HD has proven difficult for mental health professionals. Research in this area is urgently needed. HD accelerates with age so mental health professionals are likely to see more cases of this disorder as the number of older adults increases. Some patients have poor insight and can seem oblivious to their plight. Many describe themselves as “thrifty” or “saving things” for others should a need arise.  Drastic interventions, like a forced clean-up of the home, have been shown to significantly increase the risk of suicide. Questions linger over what point hoarding behavior may constitute a danger to self, requiring involuntary hospitalization. HD seems to have a very high relapse rate with current treatments of SSRI medications and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Case management with routine home visits proved to be of benefit but legal and ethical dilemmas are present in this form of treatment. HD seems to be a condition of equifinality, meaning there are many paths involved in the earlier question of “why someone would do that.”

 

References

Ayers, C. R., Iqbal, Y., & Strickland, K. (2014). Medical conditions in geriatric hoarding disorder patients. Aging & Mental Health, 18(2), 148-151. doi:10.1080/13607863.2013.814105

Bratiotis, C., Steketee, G., & Schmalisch, C. S. (2011). The Hoarding Handbook: A Guide for Human Service Professionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Drury, H., Ajmi, S., Fernandez de la Cruz, L., Nordsletten, A. E., & Mataix-Cols, D. (2014). Caregiver burden, family accommodation, health, and well-being in relatives of individuals with hoarding disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 159, 7-14. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.01.023

Saxena, S. (2007). Is compulsive hoarding a genetically and neurobiologically discrete syndrome? Implications for diagnostic classification. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(3), 380-384. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.164.3.380

Rain Blohm, MS

WKPIC Doctoral Intern