Friday Factoids: Anger Rules and the Anger Thermometer

 

One of the most common problems in children with behavioral issues is the anger they experience. Behaviorally disordered children may get angry much easier and quicker than their peers. Therapists working with children are in need of interventions that can help a child to think before he acts.

 

One of the interventions Dr. Tony Sheppard (2012) recommends is the concept of the Anger Rules. The Anger Rules involves a child making a decision regarding his anger or looking at how he handled his anger after the fact. The Anger Rules offer a very simple set of guidelines for checking ourselves when faced with a difficult situation. This concept is discussed in the anger workbook, A Volcano in My Tummy, by Elaine Whitehouse and Warwick Pudney. This workbook teaches there are two general categories of responses to anger: clean and dirty. Clean anger is the type that obeys all of the Anger Rules while dirty anger violates one or more of the Anger Rules. This concept offers a very simple way for the child to check himself with how he has managed his anger. An example involves a lunch line situation in which a child throws a lunch tray at the wall. By using the Anger Rules checklist, the child asks, “Did I hurt others? No. Did I hurt myself? No. Did I hurt property? Yes.” Therefore, throwing a tray at the wall was, in fact, dirty anger.

 

Now if the child thinks before he acts, his anger is rising to the top of the Anger Thermometer because the child behind him is standing too close and bumping into him. The child thinks to himself, “I need to get the teacher or I am going to hit this kid!” The Anger Rules asks: “Will this hurt others? No. Will it hurt me? No. Will it hurt property? No.” Getting the teacher for help before acting is an example of clean anger. Processing situations and looking at clean versus dirty anger can really help a child to think before he acts and figure out the best course of action for that particular situation.

 

Sheppard, T.L. (2012). Parent guide to the anger thermometer and the anger rules. Groupworks Inc.

 

Cindy A. Geil, M.A.
WKPIC Doctoral Intern

 

Friday Factoids: Seasonal Affective Disorder

 

In the parts of the country currently in the depths of winter, people may be experiencing cases of the “winter blues.”

 

Very often people notice increases moodiness and a lack of energy beginning in fall and lasting through the winter. This may be due to Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD).  Seasonal Affective Disorder most commonly occurs during the winter and fall, but can also be experienced during the summer. According to the Mayo Clinic, the symptoms of SAD (quite an appropriate acronym) that occurs during fall and winter are similar to those of other depressive disorders: depression, hopelessness, anxiety, loss of energy, heaviness in the arms or legs, social withdrawal, oversleeping, loss of interest in once enjoyable activities, weight gain, appetite changes, and difficulty concentrating.

 

Treatment often includes phototherapy, which entails exposure to sunlight, if possible, or light boxes which are specially designed for treatment, filter out damaging UV rays, have been shown by research to be as effective as antidepressants, and exhibit a more rapid onset of effectiveness than antidepressants. SAD appears to be more and more common the further one is from the equator, perhaps as a factor of the amount of sunlight and/or the exposure to longer periods of sunlight. It is no wonder, then, that Hawaii and other locations close to equator are such hot vacation hotspots and that there is a higher cost of living.

 

Going to the beach does sound like a great idea right about now!

 

For more information about Seasonal Affective Disorder, including treatment and prevention, visit the Mayo Clinic’s website.  http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/seasonal-affective-disorder/DS00195

 

Cassandra Sturycz,
Psychology Practicum Student

 

 

 

Welcome to the 2014-2015 Internship Class

Hooray!

 

 

WKPIC is thrilled to announce that we filled our 3 slots during Round I of Match this year–with awesome students! We extend a hearty welcome to Brittany Best, Faisal Roberts, and Graham Martin. We look forward to working with all of you come September!

 

 

 

Susan R. Vaught, Ph.D.
WKPIC Training Director

Friday Factoids: It IS Possible to Work With Teen Girls

 

Many therapists see the same types of issues when working with teenage girls – girls struggle with their self-identity, low self-esteem, body issues, trying to fit in and ensure people will like and accept them.

 

Pipher (1994) in her book, Reviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls, discusses these issues that adolescent girls deal with in their everyday lives. Pipher (1994) discusses a scene in which she was sitting on a bench outside of her favorite ice-cream store. She saw a mother and teenage daughter stop in front of her and wait for the light to change. She heard the mother say, “You have got to stop blackmailing your father and me. Every time you don’t get what you want, you tell us that you want to run away from home or kill yourself. What’s happened to you? You use to be able to handle not getting your way.” The daughter stared blankly straight ahead, barely acknowledging her mother’s words. The light changed and next she saw a very different scene. Another mother approached the same light with her preadolescent daughter. The mother and daughter were holding hands. The daughter said to the mother, “This is fun. Let’s do this all afternoon.”

 

Something very dramatic takes place to girls in early adolescence. Just as planes and ships disappear mysteriously into the Bermuda Triangle, so do the selves of girls. They crash and burn in a social and developmental Bermuda Triangle taking the happiness away from them. In early adolescence, studies show that girls’ IQ scores drop. Girls lose their assertive, energetic personalities and become more deferential, self-critical, and depressed. They report great unhappiness with their bodies. Girls are often happy and free but then loose themselves in adolescence. They often fall in love with boys and live only for their approval. Girls have no sense of inner direction; rather they struggle to meet the demands of others. Their value is determined only by their approval. A girl once said, “Everything good in me died in junior high.”

 

Pipher then discusses some interventions she uses with these adolescent girls. The most important question she says she asks her adolescent clients is “Who are you?” She says she is not as interested in the answer as in teaching a process that the girl can use for the rest of her life. The process involves looking within to find a true core of self, acknowledging unique gifts, accepting all feelings, not just socially acceptable ones, and making deep and firm decisions about values and meaning. It includes discussion about breaking the cultural rules set out for women and formulating new, healthy guidelines for the self. These girls must figure out ways to be independent from their parents and stay emotionally connected to them. They need to discover ways to achieve and still be loved. They must discover moral and meaningful ways to express their sexuality in a culture that blasts them with plastic, pathetic models of sexuality. They have to learn to respect themselves in a culture in which attractiveness is women’s most defining characteristic. Therefore, it is imperative that girls find, define, and maintain their true selves.

 

Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. New York: Ballantine Books.

 

Cindy A. Geil, M.A.
WKPIC Doctoral Intern

 

 

Friday Factoids: What Contributes Most To Success?

 

Intelligence, self-discipline, or chance? What is the strongest contributor to success?

 

This is a complicated question. I think that it is too simplistic to think that the smarter you are, the more successful you will be. We can recall how many times we have completed an intelligence test when applying for a new job or a promotion. This obviously never happens.  More likely consideration for a position is focused on past performance and achievement.

 

The above statement leaves out too many situational factors including perhaps the most important- self-discipline.  Richard Nisbett discusses in his book, Intelligence and How to Get It: Why Schools and Cultures Count, the strong relationship between delayed gratification in the marshmallow experiment with children and their achievement scores in the future.  The marshmallow experiment gives the participant the options of either receiving one marshmallow now or two marshmallows after a set time.  Children who were able to wait longer to receive more marshmallows were more likely to have higher standardized achievement test scores.

 

However, Malcolm Gladwell wrote in his book, Outliers: The Story of Success, that immense success depends primarily on the special advantages one receives that make it possible to reach such success, once expertise has been achieve via the 10,000 Hour Rule. He cited such stories as how Bill Gates developed an affinity for computers and later achieved extreme wealth after he was given access to computers at a time when computers were not widely available.  Gladwell argues that Gates would have likely been a successful professional, but perhaps not a professional worth $50 billion.  Such high levels of success do not depend on raw aptitude and hard work alone.

 

So for now, there is no easy answer for my initial question.  Like many complicated questions, there are many complicated answers.  For more information on intelligence and success or for help forming an opinion of your own on this matter, you can check out the books I have discussed here:

Gladwell, M. (2009). Outliers: The story of success. Penguin UK.

Nisbett, R. E. (2009). Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and cultures count. New York:  W. W. Norton.

 

Cassandra Sturycz
Psychology Practicum Student